I would like to offer that it would be helpful if you provide the pros and cons of the issue and then ask my opinion.
Without balanced information to understand impacts/benefits, it is very difficult to weigh in.
For instance, what are possible benefits to neighborhoods, vendors, restaurants, tax base, city image? What are drawbacks--is there likely to be increased noise, trash, traffic congestion, restaurant closures? What have been the experiences of other similar ciites?
You could provide a SWOT analysis of the issue, or provide an examination of the core issues as the League of Women Voters does with ballot questions.
In other words, I want help in understanding the issue first so that I can make an informed judgment before I offer my opinions.
Look to Boston for inspiration- trucks such as Roxy's and Mei Mei have opened brick and mortar establishments after a successful run as food truck operators.
http://www.cityofboston.gov/foodtrucks/schedule-tabs.asp
In most cities, food trucks are heavily regulated and inspected, just like restaurants. Operators must be current on food safety and sanitation licensing, must prepare all foods in a licensed kitchen (either a time sharing commercial kitchen or in conjunction with a professional kitchen.
The problem with Worcester's last ordinance is that it was created to kill off any food trucks- hence the 5 minute rule, and the 500 foot buffer zone from any other establishment serving food. That gave places like 7-11 and corner stores the right to shut down a truck that could make something delicious, instead of fast food. Right now the only places you see a food truck are in deserted areas of Worcester, far away from any foot traffic (with the exception of the Dive Bar- the owner welcomes food trucks).
I see no down side to food trucks in Worcester- we live in New England- long winters, wet springs, hot summers. The brick and mortar places will do fine even with the inclusion of food trucks. If they can't compete with a food truck, there are probably a host of other compelling reasons for their lack of patronage.
"balanced information to understand impacts/benefits, it is very difficult to weigh in."
This is what was needed before a ordinance was put in place.Now what is needed is just common sense - something is wrong if other cities see benefit but this City puts in restrictive ordinance first.
Please create an account or log in to submit your comments or vote on those submitted by other users.
The ideas and opinions expressed by registered users of this forum are those of the authors
and do not reflect the opinions of
the City of Worcester, MA.